|
||
| About Us | Countries | Projects | Development Education | Campaigns & Resources | Contact Us | ||
African Initiatives in Ghana & Tanzania |
||
TanzaniaGeography Population History Trade and Debt In 1986, an economic recovery plan went into effect, following IMF and World Bank guidelines and in 1993 the Government pledged to the IMF it would implement a strict programme of economic adjustment. These measures have had disastrous consequences, including the elimination of 20,000 public sector jobs. Education spending has been reduced by 30% and electricity bills and taxes have been raised. Tanzania is now considered for debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Country Initiative (HIPC). But the implications of subsidies have negated any positive effect this status might have. At its peak the cotton industry was Tanzania’s largest employer, with 14 textile mills employing nearly 35,000 people. Today most of the factories have closed down. This is because there are heavy cotton subsidies (50%) in the USA. Because of subsidies, Tanzania will find it easier to import something than buy it locally and Tanzanian farmers find it hard to compete with Western farmers because their production costs are much lower. The impact of subsidies is far bigger than the amount of aid Tanzania is receiving under HIPC status. |
||
Ghana"Freedom is not something that people can bestow on another as a gift. They claim it as their own and none can keep it from them." Geography Population History Today, Ghana is considered for debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Country Initiative (HIPC). However this debt relief, aid and new loans come with social and economic policies attached. These are often unpopular, undemocratic and fail to reduce poverty – including the forced privatisation of water services and “Liberalisation”, which forces open Ghana’s agriculture markets to foreign imports. Ghana is not allowed to invest or subsidise its farmers yet heavily subsidised chicken, rice and tomatoes which are dumped in local markets by the EU and US are now cheaper than local produce. |
||
| Home | Contact Us | Web Design | ||